HKSAR v. Cheung Ka Chun

Read the full judgment text of DCCC 319/2018 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 20 August 2018.

1. The defendant pleads guilty to one charge of trafficking in 13.59 grammes of a powder containing 11.19 grammes of ketamine, contrary to section 4 of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance [1] .

Cites 1 case

Case No.DCCC 319/2018[2018] HKDC 1017
Court
District Court
Date20 Aug 2018
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

DCCC 319/2018

[2018] HKDC 1017

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 319 OF 2018

____________

  HKSAR  
  v  
  CHEUNG KA CHUN  

____________

Before: HH Judge Dufton
Date: 20 August 2018
Present: Mr Yeung Shak Nung, counsel on fiat, for HKSAR
Mr Alex Leung of Tang, Wong & Cheung, assigned by the Director of Legal Aid, for the defendant
Offence: Trafficking in a dangerous drug (販運危險藥物)

REASONS FOR SENTENCE

1.The defendant pleads guilty to one charge of trafficking in 13.59 grammes of a powder containing 11.19 grammes of ketamine, contrary to section 4 of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance[1].

2.In summary at around 6:31 p.m. on 2 February this year the police saw private car MD 2065 outside Exit A of the Che Kung Temple MTR Station.   The defendant was sitting in the driver’s seat and a friend of the defendant was sitting in the front passenger seat.  The police found in the right front pocket of the defendant’s jacket two plastic bags inside which was a total of twenty plastic bags containing the ketamine. 

3.Under caution and in a subsequent video recorded interview the defendant said he was helping someone deliver the ketamine in return for a reward of $500.

4.The police also found on the defendant $1,960; a mobile phone; two credit cards and two Octopus cards.

Mitigation

5.In passing sentence, I have carefully considered everything said on behalf of the defendant by Mr Leung, including that the defendant acted out of momentary greed and that this is an isolated offence for which the defendant is now remorseful. 

6.I take into account that the defendant is only 23 and that he has no previous convictions for trafficking in drugs.  The defendant was however convicted of possession of drugs in 2009 when he was sentenced to probation. 

Sentence

7.In Secretary for Justice v Hii Siew Cheng[2] the Court of Appeal laid down guidelines for trafficking in ketamine.  Where the narcotic content is between 10 and 50 grammes sentence after trial falls within the range of 4-6 years’ imprisonment. 

8.On a purely mathematical approach a starting point of just over 4 years would be appropriate for trafficking in 11.19 grammes of ketamine.  Taking into account the relatively young age of the defendant and that he has no previous convictions for trafficking in drugs, I am satisfied a starting point of 4 years’ imprisonment is appropriate. 

9.Giving the defendant full credit for his plea of guilty the defendant is convicted and sentenced to 2 years and 8 months’ imprisonment.

  (D. J. DUFTON)
  District Judge


[1] Cap 134.

[2] [2008] 3 HKC 325.