Nonis Pattini Kuttige Sampath Thushara v. The Petition Teams (Security Bureau
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 1498/2018 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 15 October 2018.
2. This application was filed on 30 July 2018 (Application) with a supporting affirmation of the same date (Affirmation). Neither of these documents contain any ground for the Application.
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case
|
HCAL 1498/2018 [2018] HKCFI 2317 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO. 1498 OF 2018 BETWEEN
Application for leave to apply for judicial review Following:
Order by the Honourable Mr. Justice Anthony Chan
Observations for the applicant: 1.These are my short reasons. 2.This application was filed on 30 July 2018 (Application) with a supporting affirmation of the same date (Affirmation). Neither of these documents contain any ground for the Application. 3.It was suggested in the Affirmation that the Applicant would provide his grounds for the Application. A letter to him from the Torture Claims Appeal Board (Board) dated 12 July 2018 was exhibited to the Affirmation. That letter referred to an attached document setting out the reasons of the Board by which the Applicant’s appeal was declined. However, that document was not exhibited to the Affirmation. 4.Nearly two and a half months had expired since the filing of the Application. No ground has been received from the Applicant. 5.This Applicant had previously made an application for leave to apply for judicial review (HCAL 17/2013) in respect of a decision of the Board dated 7 January 2013 on his torture claim. 6.After the refusal of leave by this court, the Applicant lodged an appeal to the Court of Appeal. However, his appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution on 4 September 2013 (CACV 49/2013). 7.The Applicant is not ignorant of the procedure of the court. I see no reason to entertain this application when he has not provided any ground in support or even the decision of the Board against him. Nothing has been heard from the Applicant since 30 July 2018. 8.In the premises, this application is refused. Dated the 15th day of October 2018.
Where leave to apply has been granted, applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of the application in the light of the respondent’s evidence.
Form CALL-1 |
Cases cited in this judgment