Wang Qian Wei v. 郭文雨 and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 2700/2017 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 5 October 2018.

1.  Paragraph 49 should be read as “For the above reasons, it is directed that the Mainland Judgment dated 15 September 2015 be registered according to Section 11 of the Mainland Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Ordinance, Cap 597, on the basis of the rate of exchange prevailing at the date of registration. This Court grants an order in terms of paragraph 2 of the Originating Summons dated 13 December 2017 with a costs order nisi that all costs including costs of the 1 st Defendant’s Summons d

Cited by 3 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMP 2700/2017[2018] HKCFI 2253
Court
High Court CFI
Date05 Oct 2018
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 2700/2017

[2018] HKCFI 2253

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 2700 OF 2017

________________________

  IN THE MATTER of Judgment (2017) 閩民申77號handed down by福建省高級人民法院on 23 November 2017 and Judgment (2014) 厦民初字第1190號handed down by福建省中級人民法院on 15 September 2015
  and
  IN THE MATTER of Order 71A of the Rules of the High Court
  and
  IN THE MATTER of the Mainland Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Ordinance, Cap 597 of the Laws of Hong Kong

________________________

BETWEEN    
  WANG QIAN WEI (王前偉) Plaintiff
  and  
  郭文雨 1st Defendant
  郭小琼 2nd Defendant

________________________

Before:  Deputy High Court Judge William Wong SC in Court

Date of Hearing:  21 September 2018

Date of Judgment:  5 October 2018

Date of Corrigendum:  20 November 2018


__________________

CORRIGENDUM

__________________

1.  Paragraph 49 should be read as “For the above reasons, it is directed that the Mainland Judgment dated 15 September 2015 be registered according to Section 11 of the Mainland Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Ordinance, Cap 597, on the basis of the rate of exchange prevailing at the date of registration. This Court grants an order in terms of paragraph 2 of the Originating Summons dated 13 December 2017 with a costs order nisi that all costs including costs of the 1st Defendant’s Summons dated 11 September 2018 are to be paid by the 1st Defendant to the Plaintiff forthwith, on a party to party basis, to be taxed if not agreed. Unless any parties apply to vary the costs order nisi within 14 days after this judgment is handed down, the same shall become absolute upon the expiry of the 14-day period.”

  (Hilary Yu)
  Clerk to Deputy High Court Judge
  William Wong SC