Re Asghar Fahad
Read the full judgment text of CAMP 84/2018 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 3 December 2018.
1. On 6 September 2018, this Court (Lam VP and Kwan JA) handed down judgment dismissing the applicant’s application for leave to appeal out of time against the decision of Deputy High Court Judge Josiah Lam given on 25 April 2018 refusing him leave to apply for judicial review.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
CAMP 84/2018 [2018] HKCA 908 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 84 OF 2018 (ON AN INTENDED APPEAL FROM HCAL 729/2017) ___________________________
___________________________
___________________ J U D G M E N T ___________________ Hon Lam VP (giving the Judgment of the Court): 1.On 6 September 2018, this Court (Lam VP and Kwan JA) handed down judgment dismissing the applicant’s application for leave to appeal out of time against the decision of Deputy High Court Judge Josiah Lam given on 25 April 2018 refusing him leave to apply for judicial review. 2.By a Notice of Motion dated 26 September 2018, the applicant applied for leave to appeal against our judgment to the Court of Final Appeal. 3.On 9 October 2018, the applicant also lodged a written submission, in which the applicant repeated the factual background of his case. 4.Pursuant to paragraph 3 of Practice Direction 2.1, we consider it is appropriate to deal with this application on paper without an oral hearing. 5.Section 22(1)(b) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance (Cap 484) provides that:
6.No question of great, general, or public importance has been raised in the notice of motion or submissions of the applicant. There is also no basis for leave to be granted on the “otherwise” limb. Accordingly, the statutory criteria laid down under section 22(1)(b) are not met. 7.For these reasons, we dismiss the Notice of Motion dated 26 September 2018.
The applicant acting in person |
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CAMP 84/2018