Yu Yee Fung and Another v. Clever Brilliant Ltd and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCA 417/2018 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 28 November 2018.

1. In light that there is a Mareva Injunction order in place, which was made by Lisa Wong J on 23 May 2018 in HCA 1211/2018, against the 1 st Defendant in the present proceedings specifically restraining the disposal of the moneys in the account of the Garnishee here, the Bank of China (Hong Kong) Limited., I would have to be satisfied that there is proper basis to make the Garnishee Order Nisi absolute before I could make such order. I would therefore adjourn the application to a date to be fix

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 417/2018[2018] HKCFI 2650
Court
High Court CFI
Date28 Nov 2018
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 417/2018

[2018] HKCFI 2650

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 417 OF 2018

______________

BETWEEN    
  YU YEE FUNG 1st Plaintiff
(Judgment Creditor)
  MAN KAM TONG 2nd Plaintiff
(Judgment Creditor)
  and  
  CLEVER BRILLIANT LIMITED 1st Defendant
(Judgment Debtor)
  FAN PUI WAN MARGARET 2nd Defendant
  BANK OF CHINA (HONG KONG) LIMITED Garnishee

______________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge Kenneth Wong in Chambers
Date of Hearing: 28 November 2018
Date of Decision: 28 November 2018

______________

D E C I S I O N

______________

1.In light that there is a Mareva Injunction order in place, which was made by Lisa Wong J on 23 May 2018 in HCA 1211/2018, against the 1st Defendant in the present proceedings specifically restraining the disposal of the moneys in the account of the Garnishee here, the Bank of China (Hong Kong) Limited., I would have to be satisfied that there is proper basis to make the Garnishee Order Nisi absolute before I could make such order. I would therefore adjourn the application to a date to be fixed with 30 minutes reserved for the Judgment Creditor to make detailed submissions on the basis of the application in light of the said Mareva Injunction order. The 1st Defendant’s solicitor indicated to the Court that his client has no objection to the Garnishee Order Nisi being made absolute and for the purpose of saving costs he applies for his attendance at the adjourned hearing be excused. I see no reason not to grant the application and I so order. I also order that the costs today be reserved.

 
 

  (Kenneth Wong)
  Deputy High Court Judge

Mr Tse Yin Fung, of Cheung, Chan & Wong, for the 1st and 2nd Plaintiffs

Mr Chan Yiu Pun, Jimmy, of Cheung & Liu for the 1st Defendant

The Garnishee was not represented and did not appear