HKSAR v. Chan Shui Lun

Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 9 November 2018.

1.  Line 2 – “… the Rule 7(1) summons” should read “…a summons issued by the Registrar under Rule 7(1) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Rules (Cap.484A) to show cause why the application for leave to appeal should not be dismissed”.

Cited by 3 cases

Case No.[2018] HKCFA 47
Court
Date09 Nov 2018
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

FAMC No. 21 of 2018

[2018] HKCFA 47

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 21 OF 2018 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

FROM HCMA NO. 76 OF 2017)

_______________________

BETWEEN

HKSAR Respondent
and
CHAN SHUI LUN (陳瑞麟) Applicant

_______________________

Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Fok PJ and Mr Justice Stock NPJ

Date of Hearing and Determination: 6 November 2018

Date of Reasons for Determination: 9 November 2018

Date of Corrigendum: 11 December 2018

___________________

CORRIGENDUM

___________________

Please note the following amendment in the Reasons for Determination dated 9 November 2018:

On page 2 at paragraph 5:

1.  Line 2 – “… the Rule 7(1) summons” should read “…a summons issued by the Registrar under Rule 7(1) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Rules (Cap.484A) to show cause why the application for leave to appeal should not be dismissed”.

Dated this 11th day of December 2018.

  (Phemie Chan)
  for Acting Registrar, CFA

HKSAR v. Chan Shui Lun [] | BabelCite