Chan Yee Ling Elaine v. M/S Christine M.Koo & Ip,Solicitors & Notaries
Read the full judgment text of HCLA 6/2018 on BabelCite. This HCLA judgment was delivered on 14 December 2018.
1. Paragraph 17 of the decision should read, “… I find it important to emphasize that it is not , and ought not to be used as, a pretext for a claimant to try to put in issue all factual findings madeby a tribunal and to put them under minute scrutiny.”.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
HCLA 6/2018 [2018] HKCFI 2670 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE LABOUR TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO 6 OF 2018 (ON APPEAL FROM LABOUR TRIBUNAL ______________
______________ Before: Deputy High Court Judge Keith Yeung SC in Chambers Dates of Hearing: 20 June and 11 July 2018 Date of Decision: 14 December 2018 Date of Corrigendum: 15 January 2019 ________________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ________________________ Please note the following corrigendum in the Decision dated 14 December 2018:- 1. Paragraph 17 of the decision should read, “… I find it important to emphasize that it is not, and ought not to be used as, a pretext for a claimant to try to put in issue all factual findings madeby a tribunal and to put them under minute scrutiny.”. Dated this the 15th January 2019
| ||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCLA 6/2018