Re Hossain Monir
Read the full judgment text of CACV 211/2018 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 4 February 2019.
1. We handed down the judgment on 21 November 2018 (“ the Judgment ”) dismissing the applicant’s appeal from an order of DHCJ Josiah Lam given on 29 May 2018 dismissing his application for leave to start judicial review proceedings (“ the Judge’s Decision ”).
Cited by 1 case
|
CACV 211/2018 [2019] HKCA 146 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO 211 OF 2018 (ON APPEAL FROM HCAL 699 OF 2017) -----------------------------------
-----------------------------------
___________________ J U D G M E N T ___________________ Hon Yuen JA (giving the Judgment of the Court): 1.We handed down the judgment on 21 November 2018 (“the Judgment”) dismissing the applicant’s appeal from an order of DHCJ Josiah Lam given on 29 May 2018 dismissing his application for leave to start judicial review proceedings (“the Judge’s Decision”). 2.On 6 December 2018, the applicant issued a Notice of Motion seeking leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal. The grounds were as follows:
3.According to the directions made by Master Au Yeung, Registrar of Civil Appeals on 10 December 2018, the applicant shall lodge with the court his written submissions in support of the Notice of Motion on or before 20 December 2018. The applicant failed to lodge his written submissions as directed. Pursuant to Practice Direction 2.1, we are of the view that this application can be processed on paper without any oral hearing. 4.The legal principle for granting leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal is set out in Section 22(1)(b) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap. 484:
5.We have thoroughly considered the applicant’s Notice of Motion. The applicant seeks to re-argue the grounds and points which had already been canvassed. The legal principles in respect of appeal and when this court should interfere with the Judge’s Decision were set out clearly in the Judgment. 6.The applicant has not identified any question of great general or public importance. We also do not see any basis for granting leave on the “or otherwise” limb under section 22(1)(b). 7.In the circumstances, we cannot find any basis for granting leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal pursuant to section 22(1)(b). 8.By virtue of the above, the Notice of Motion dated 6 December 2018 is dismissed.
The applicant acting in person |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 211/2018