Re Gurbachan Singh
Read the full judgment text of CACV 299/2018 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 27 February 2019.
1. By our judgment dated 27 November 2018 (published as [2018] HKCA 880 ), we (Lam VP and Kwan JA) dismissed the applicant’s appeal from the decision of Deputy High Court Judge Bruno Chan dated 29 June 2018 (published as [2018] HKCFI 1434 ) refusing leave to apply for judicial review.
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 2 cases
|
CACV 299/2018 [2019] HKCA 212 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO 299 OF 2018 (ON APPEAL FROM HCAL 893/2017) _____________________
_____________________ Before: Hon Lam VP, Kwan and Au JJA in Court Date of Written Submissions: 12 December 2018 Date of Judgment: 27 February 2019 ___________________ JUDGMENT ___________________ Hon Lam VP (giving the Judgment of the Court): 1.By our judgment dated 27 November 2018 (published as [2018] HKCA 880), we (Lam VP and Kwan JA) dismissed the applicant’s appeal from the decision of Deputy High Court Judge Bruno Chan dated 29 June 2018 (published as [2018] HKCFI 1434) refusing leave to apply for judicial review. 2.In his notice of motion filed on 28 November 2018, the applicant gave these grounds for seeking leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal:
3.In his written submissions lodged on 12 December 2018, the applicant reiterated his personal circumstances and his perceived fear of threat if refouled. 4.The matters raised by the applicant in the notice of motion and the written submissions do not give rise to any question of great general or public importance. Nor do we see any reason to grant leave on the “or otherwise” limb. The statutory criterion for granting leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal is therefore not met: section 22(1)(b) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance (Cap 484). 5.Accordingly, we dismiss the application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal.
The applicant acting in person |
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 299/2018