Read the full judgment text of CACC 269/2017 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 13 March 2019.
1. The applicants (whom I shall refer to by their trial designations as “D1” and “D2”) jointly faced a charge of blackmailing PW1 on 15 June 2016, contrary to section 23(1) and (3) of the Theft Ordinance, Cap 210 (Charge 1). D1 also faced a further charge of blackmailing the same person on the following day (Charge 2). They stood trial together in consolidated proceedings before Deputy Judge Wan (“the judge”) in the District Court.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 2 cases