Read the full judgment text of CACV 000304/1999 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 26 November 1999.
1. On 1st September 1999, Suffiad J. dismissed the Plaintiff's claim against the 4th and 5th Defendants for want of prosecution. His order was sealed on 18th September. The order was an interlocutory one. Thus, if the Plaintiff decided to appeal against the order, he had to serve the Notice of Appeal by 2nd October: see Ord. 59 r. 4(1)(a). In fact, it was not served until 29th October. Accordingly, the Plaintiff now applies for an extension of time for serving the Notice of Appeal. If he does no