Read the full judgment text of HCPI 838/2015 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 15 April 2019.
1. The plaintiff (“ P ”) was/is employed by the defendant (“ D ”) as an Assistant Officer II of the Correctional Services Department (“ CSD ”). At the material time, he worked at Lai Chi Kok Reception Centre (“ Centre ”). There was no dispute (a) D was P’s employer within the meaning of the Occupational Safety and Health Ordinance Cap 509 (“ OSHO ”) and was responsible for the Centre as a workplace within the meaning of OSHO, (b) D was an occupier of the Centre within the meaning of the Occupier
Cited by 1 case · Cites 15 cases