Read the full judgment text of CACV 20/2019 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 17 May 2019.
5. The Judge held that many of the applicant’s complaints against the Board were broad and vague assertions without particulars or specifics or elaborations as to how they applied to his case, or how the Board erred in its decision. The Judge agreed with the Director and the Board that the applicant’s perceived risk of harm is a localized one. Internal relocation was possible.
Cites 7 cases