Read the full judgment text of CACV 606/2018 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 17 May 2019.
5. The Judge held that the applicant was wrong to say that the Director failed to screen the applicant’s non‑refoulement claim, as it was the applicant that failed to supply additional information. The Judge held that there was no question of state acquiescence as the applicant did not seek help from the authorities. Further, the Board did not believe the applicant’s torture claim.
Cites 7 cases