Cm v. Xdy

Read the full judgment text of FCMP 154/2018 on BabelCite. This FCMP judgment was delivered on 4 April 2019.

1. In paragraph 14 at Page 9, line M to N, “The Court of Appeal overturned the decision that neither the husband and the wife ...” should be read as “The Court of Appeal overturned the decision, holding that neither the husband nor the wife...”

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.FCMP 154/2018[2019] HKFC 90
Court
FCMP
Date04 Apr 2019
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

FCMP 154 / 2018

[2019] HKFC 90

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS

NUMBER 154 OF 2018

----------------------------

  IN THE MATTER of an Application by CM under sections 29AC of the Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Ordinance (Cap 192)

BETWEEN
  CM Applicant
and
  XDY Respondent

----------------------------

Coram: Deputy Judge J. Chow in Chambers (Not Open to Public)
Date of Hearing: 10 October 2018 & 15 February 2019
Date of Judgment: 4 April 2019

---------------------------------------

CORRIGENDUM

---------------------------------------

1.In paragraph 14 at Page 9, line M to N, “The Court of Appeal overturned the decision that neither the husband and the wife ...” should be read as “The Court of Appeal overturned the decision, holding that neither the husband nor the wife...”

2.In paragraph 16 at Page 10, line D to E, “The application (See ZC v CN, para 9.4)” should be read as “(See ZN v CN, para 9.4).”

3.In paragraph 17 at Page 10, line H to J, “The applicant did not explain why she could have looked for alternative accommodation …” should be read as “The applicant did not explain why she could not have looked for alternative accommodation …”



Dated this 27th day of May, 2019.

 
 

  (Ms. W.M. LIU)
  Clerk to Deputy District Judge J. CHOW

Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

Cited by 1 case

Other judgments that cite this case

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under FCMP 154/2018