HKSAR v. Chan Yip Chi

Read the full judgment text of CACC 153/2001 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 17 August 2001.

1. I grant the Applicant leave to appeal against his sentence. The judge did not state what his overall starting-point was in the case of the Applicant, but it can be inferred from what he said about D1 that he took an overall starting-point of 6 years' imprisonment and discounted it by 50% to reflect the Applicant's pleas of guilty, his offer to give evidence against D2 and the totality principle. In my opinion, it is arguable that the overall starting-point was much too high, and that the appr

Cites 2 cases

Case No.CACC 153/2001
Court
Court of Appeal
Date17 Aug 2001
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC000153/2001

CACC 153/2001

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 153 OF 2001

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC NO. 1181 OF 2000)

______________

BETWEEN

THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

AND
CHAN YIP CHI

______________

Coram: Keith JA in Court

Date of Hearing: 17 August 2001

Date of Judgment: 17 August 2001

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

1. I grant the Applicant leave to appeal against his sentence. The judge did not state what his overall starting-point was in the case of the Applicant, but it can be inferred from what he said about D1 that he took an overall starting-point of 6 years' imprisonment and discounted it by 50% to reflect the Applicant's pleas of guilty, his offer to give evidence against D2 and the totality principle. In my opinion, it is arguable that the overall starting-point was much too high, and that the appropriate overall starting-point, having regard to the fact that the Applicant had four counterfeit credit cards which he used in an unsuccessful attempt to obtain goods worth about $16,000.00, should have been in the region of 3 years' imprisonment: see Poon Cho Chu (CACC 55/2000).

(Brian Keith)
Justice of Appeal

Representation:

Applicant in person.

Mr Jackson Poon, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent.

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACC 153/2001