Read the full judgment text of DCEC 1899/2017 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 21 June 2019.
1. The applicant claimed that since 2013, he worked for the respondent at various construction sites Sheung Shui as a general labourer. He gave evidence that the respondent instructed him where to work and what task to do on the sites. The respondent sometimes drove the workers to the sites in Sheung Shui after meeting up at a specific point in Sheung Shui. The applicant told the court that throughout 2013 to 2015 when the applicant worked for him, the respondent was the one paying him wages