Worldwide Flight Services Holdings S.A. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd and Another v. Kai Tak Cruise Plaza Ltd and Another
Read the full judgment text of CACV 393/2018 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 26 July 2019.
1. In paragraph 44, line N - O, “…within three weeks of the handing down of this judgment…” should read as “…within four weeks of the handing down of this judgment …”.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
CACV 393/2018 [2019] HKCA 828 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO 393 OF 2018 (ON APPEAL FROM HCA 1157 OF 2016) _______________
_______________
___________________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ___________________________ 1.In paragraph 44, line N - O, “…within three weeks of the handing down of this judgment…” should read as “…within four weeks of the handing down of this judgment …”. 2.In paragraph 56(1), line L – M, “Possession of the Premises to be given to the plaintiffs at the expiration of 21 days from the date of this order, …” should read as “Possession of the Premises to be given to the plaintiffs at the expiration of 28 days from the date of this order, …”.
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 393/2018