Wong Tin Chee Tinly and Others v. Wong To Yick and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1316/2018 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 22 August 2019.

1.   Page 3, paragraph 2(d), line C, “Ds” should read “Ps”.

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMP 1316/2018[2019] HKCFI 2064
Court
High Court CFI
Date22 Aug 2019
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 1316/2018

[2019] HKCFI 2064

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 1316 OF 2018

________________________

  IN THE MATTER of an Assignment dated 8 September 1977 of the property known as Office A, 1stFloor, Fu On Commercial Building, Nos 190 – 192 Cheung Sha Wan Road, Kowloon
  and
  IN THE MATTER of Order 85, rule 2 of the Rules of the High Court (Cap 4A)

________________

BETWEEN
WONG TIN CHEE TINLY (黃天賜) 1st Plaintiff
WONG YUK KUEN (黃玉娟) 2nd Plaintiff
WONG WEI KIN CATHY (黃慧娟) 3rd Plaintiff
  WONG SHEUNG KIN LUCIA (黃嫦娟) 4th Plaintiff
and
  WONG TO YICK (黃道益) 1st Defendant
LAW KAM MUI (羅金梅) 2nd Defendant

________________

Before: Hon Marlene Ng J in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 14 August 2019

Date of Handing Down Judgment: 22 August 2019

Date of Corrigendum: 28 August 2019

________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________


Please note the following amendments in the Judgment dated 22 August 2019: -

1.   Page 3, paragraph 2(d), line C, “Ds” should read “Ps”.

2.   Page 4, paragraph 7, line G to H, “10 September 2019” should read “10 September 2018”.

3.   Page 4, paragraph 9, line P “D1 1st Aff” should read “D2 1st Aff”.

4.   Page 6, paragraph 20, line J, “by ordinary post addressed to the D1 Address” should read “by inserting through the letterbox at D1 Address”.



Dated the 28th day of August 2019

  (S.W. TAM)
  Clerk to the Honourable Madam Justice Marlene Ng