Re Md Awlad Hossain

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 873/2017 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 23 September 2019.

1. On 27 April 2018 I refused to grant leave to the applicant to apply for judicial review of the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board(“the Board”) dismissing his non-refoulement claim upon finding none of the grounds put forward by him reasonably arguable for his intended challenge, that there was no error of law or procedural unfairness in the process before the Board or in its decision, and that there was no reasonable prospect of success in his intended application.

Cited by 3 cases

Case No.HCAL 873/2017[2019] HKCFI 2201
Court
High Court CFI
Date23 Sep 2019
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL 873/2017

[2019] HKCFI 2201

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO 873 OF 2017

_____________

RE: MD AWLAD HOSSAIN Applicant

_____________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge Bruno Chan in Chambers
Date of Hearing: 2 August 2019
Date of Decision: 23 September 2019

_____________

DECISION

_____________

1.On 27 April 2018 I refused to grant leave to the applicant to apply for judicial review of the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board(“the Board”) dismissing his non-refoulement claim upon finding none of the grounds put forward by him reasonably arguable for his intended challenge, that there was no error of law or procedural unfairness in the process before the Board or in its decision, and that there was no reasonable prospect of success in his intended application.

2.The applicant then lodged an appeal to the Court of Appeal but it was dismissed on 24 August 2018.

3.Almost one year later the applicant by a summons dated 9 July 2019 seeks leave to again appeal against my decision, which is simply just a waste of time and an abuse of process.  Accordingly this summons is dismissed.

  (Bruno Chan)
  Deputy High Court Judge

The applicant was not represented and did not appear

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 873/2017