Yip Yan Cheung Gary also known as Yip Yan Cheung v. Chow Tin Choi

Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 2645/2012 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 27 September 2019.

1. At page 6, paragraph 15, line R, “During cross-examination, the defendant was invited to …” should be amended as “During cross-examination, the plaintiff was invited to …”.

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.DCCJ 2645/2012[2019] HKDC 1292
Court
District Court
Date27 Sep 2019
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

DCCJ 2645/2012

[2019] HKDC 1292

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CIVIL ACTION NO 2645 OF 2012

________________________

BETWEEN

  YIP YAN CHEUNG GARY(葉恩暢)
also known as YIP YAN CHEUNG(葉恩暢)
Plaintiff
  and  
  CHOW TIN CHOI(周天財) Defendant
  The Occupiers of Lot No. 105 in D.D. 360, The Remaining Portion of Lot No. 106 in D.D. 360, and The Remaining Portion of Lot No. 108 in D.D. 360 The Occupier

________________________

Before: Deputy District Judge Jason Wan in Court
Dates of Hearing: 14 to 16 May and 18 June 2019
Date of Judgment: 27 September 2019
Date of Corrigendum: 3 October 2019

________________________

C O R R I G E N D A

________________________


Please note the following corrigenda in the Judgment dated 27 September 2019:

1.At page 6, paragraph 15, line R, “During cross-examination, the defendant was invited to …” should be amended as “During cross-examination, the plaintiff was invited to …”.

2.At page 9, paragraph 23, line S, “… all along owned by his family …” should be amended as “… all along occupied by his family …”.

3.At page 14, paragraph 35, line I, “… cultivated on the Land between 1982 to 2002 …” should be amended as “… cultivated on the Land between 1981 to 2002 …”.

4.At page 15, paragraph 38, line J, “Therefore, the dense vegetable observed …” should be amended as “Therefore, the dense vegetation observed …”.

5.At page 15, paragraph 39, line N, “… the aerial photos are worth mentioned” should be amended as “… the aerial photos are worth to be mentioned”.

6.At page 19, paragraph 50(1), lines B-D, “… the rights of the plaintiff in title to recover the Land have become statue-barred under section 7(2) of the Limitation Ordinance and that his titles to the Land …” should be amended as “… the rights of the plaintiff and his predecessor-in-title to recover the Land have become statute-barred under section 7(2) of the Limitation Ordinance and that their titles to the Land …”.

7.At page 20, lines G-H, the representation of the plaintiff “Mr Edward Tang and Mr Ray Chan, instructed by P Wong & Co, for the plaintiff” should be amended as “Mr Edward Tang and Mr Ryan Chan, instructed by P Wong & Co, for the plaintiff”.

  (Edmond Au)
  Clerk to Deputy District Judge Jason Wan