BabelCite

HKSAR v. Chu Ang (趙鶯)

Read the full judgment text of FAMC 34/2019 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment.

1. We accept that guidance would be helpful in connection with the establishment of the status of “agent” for the purposes of section 9 of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance (Cap 201) and grant leave on the basis that it is reasonably arguable that there has been substantial and grave injustice in that the law has been misapplied in the decisions below.

Cited by 1 case

Case No.FAMC 34/2019[2019] HKCFA 42
Court
FAMC
Date—
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary

FAMC No. 34 of 2019

[2019] HKCFA 42

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 34 OF 2019 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM

HCMA NO. 119 OF 2018)

________________________

BETWEEN    
  HKSAR Applicant
  and  
  CHU ANG (趙鶯) Respondent

________________________

Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Fok PJ and Mr Justice Chan NPJ
Date of Hearing and Determination: 15 November 2019

________________________

DETERMINATION

________________________

Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ:

1.We accept that guidance would be helpful in connection with the establishment of the status of “agent” for the purposes of section 9 of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance (Cap 201) and grant leave on the basis that it is reasonably arguable that there has been substantial and grave injustice in that the law has been misapplied in the decisions below.

2.The appeal will be heard on 21 February 2020.

(R A V Ribeiro) (Joseph Fok) (Patrick Chan)
Permanent Judge Permanent Judge Non-Permanent Judge

Mr William Tam, SC, DDPP and Ms Karen Yuen, SPP, of the Department of Justice, for the Applicant

Mr Robert S K Lee, SC and Ms Cathy W Y Chan, instructed by LCP, for the Respondent

Cited by 1 case

Other judgments that cite this case

HKSAR v. Chu Ang
Court of Final Appeal
Full analysis
01 Jun 2020