HKSAR v. Ng Siu Kan and Another
Read the full judgment text of CACC 156/2002 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 24 July 2002.
1. There was ample evidence before the Judge to support these convictions. The Judge believed the police officers and disbelieved the applicants. No convincing grounds have been advanced to justify the Court of Appeal intervening.
Cites 1 case
|
CACC000156/2002 CACC 156/2002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 156 OF 2002 (ON APPEAL FROM DCCC 999 OF 2001) ______________
______________ Coram: Hon Mayo VP in Court Date of Hearing: 24 July 2002 Date of Judgment: 24 July 2002 _______________ J U D G M E N T _______________ 1.There was ample evidence before the Judge to support these convictions. The Judge believed the police officers and disbelieved the applicants. No convincing grounds have been advanced to justify the Court of Appeal intervening. 2.The applications for leave to appeal against conviction are dismissed.
Representation: Mr P.K. Madigan, SGC, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent. Applicants in person. |
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under CACC 156/2002