HKSAR v. Mark Richard Charlton Sutherland
Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 4 December 2019.
1. Having considered written submissions from the parties as to the costs of the leave application, we ORDER the applicant to pay the respondent’s costs, certified fit for two counsel.
|
FAMC No. 62 of 2018 [2019] HKCFA 46 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 62 OF 2018 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM HCMA NO. 425 OF 2014) ________________________ BETWEEN
________________________ Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Cheung PJ and Mr Justice Chan NPJ Date of Ruling on Costs: 4 December 2019 ________________________ RULING ON COSTS ________________________ Appeal Committee: 1.Having considered written submissions from the parties as to the costs of the leave application, we ORDER the applicant to pay the respondent’s costs, certified fit for two counsel.
Written submissions by Mr Clifford Smith, SC, instructed by Oldham, Li & Nie, for the Applicant Written submissions by Mr William Tam, SC, DDPP and Mr Franco Kuan, SADPP (Ag), of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent |