HKSAR v. Tang Seh Wen

Read the full judgment text of HCCC 133/2019 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 8 October 2019.

Case No.HCCC 133/2019[2019] HKCFI 3059
Court
High Court CFI
Date08 Oct 2019
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCC 133/2019

[2019] HKCFI 3059

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CRIMINAL CASE NO 133 OF 2019

-----------------

  HKSAR  
  v  
  Tang Seh Wen  

-----------------

Before: Hon Andrew Chan J
Date: 8 October 2019 at 9.39 am
Present: Miss Hui Hei-ching Kasmine, SPP of the Department of Justice, for HKSAR
Mr Leung Hung-kuk Michael, instructed by Samuel Ho & Ci, assigned by DLA, for the accused
Offence: Trafficking in a dangerous drug (販運危險藥物)

---------------------------------

Transcript of the Audio Recording

of the Sentence in the above Case

---------------------------------

COURT:

The defendant has pleaded guilty to one count of trafficking in a dangerous drug, contrary to section 4 of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance. He is committed to this court for sentence.

The Summary of Facts reveals the following. On 1 October 2018, the defendant arrived Hong Kong from Malaysia. A customs officer found 565 grammes of heroin concealed in his shoes. The defendant was then arrested.

The street value of the heroin was estimated to be over HK$460,000.

The defendant admitted that he knowingly imported the drug into Hong Kong. The defendant is 20, a Malaysian national. He was a fruit seller with a monthly income of approximately HK$5,600. Similar to many other cases we have heard in this court, due to financial reason, the defendant agreed to take the risk by bringing the drug in question into Hong Kong. So the offence was committed purely of financial reason.

Guidelines on sentence are clear. The starting point for trafficking in 565 grammes of heroin is one of, in my view, 18 years’ imprisonment. Apart from the defendant’s plea, there are no other mitigating circumstances in this case.

The amount involved was not huge and as such, I would not further increase the sentence even though there is an international element existed in the present case.

For the offence the defendant stands convicted, he is therefore sentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment.