HKSAR v. Ma Shu Keung
Read the full judgment text of CACC 48/2019 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 20 March 2020.
1. Add the following paragraph to the judgment:
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 2 cases
|
CACC 48/2019 [2020] HKCA 170 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 48 OF 2019 (ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO 85 OF 2017) _______________
_______________ AND CACC 49/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 49 OF 2019 (ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO 84 OF 2017) _______________
_______________ (Heard together) Before: Hon Zervos JA in Court Date of Hearing: 20 March 2020 Date of Judgment: 20 March 2020 Date of Corrigendum: 26 March 2020 ________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ________________ Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 20 March 2020: 1.Add the following paragraph to the judgment: “31. I remind Ma (as to Ground 2 which was refused) and Chan (as to his only Ground which was refused) of their right to renew their applications for leave to the Court of Appeal and also remind them that should they do so, and should the Court of Appeal find no merit in their renew applications, the Court of Appeal has the power to order loss of time under section 83W(1) of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance, Cap 221.”
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACC 48/2019