HKSAR v. Ma Shu Keung

Read the full judgment text of CACC 48/2019 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 20 March 2020.

1. Add the following paragraph to the judgment:

Cited by 2 cases · Cites 2 cases

Case No.CACC 48/2019[2020] HKCA 170
Court
Court of Appeal
Date20 Mar 2020
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC 48/2019

[2020] HKCA 170

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 48 OF 2019

(ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO 85 OF 2017)

_______________

  HKSAR Respondent
  v  
  MA Shu-keung Applicant

_______________

AND

CACC 49/2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 49 OF 2019

(ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO 84 OF 2017)

_______________

  HKSAR Respondent
  v  
  CHAN Chi-yeung Applicant

_______________

(Heard together)

Before: Hon Zervos JA in Court

Date of Hearing: 20 March 2020

Date of Judgment: 20 March 2020

Date of Corrigendum: 26 March 2020

________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 20 March 2020:

1.Add the following paragraph to the judgment:

“31. I remind Ma (as to Ground 2 which was refused) and Chan (as to his only Ground which was refused) of their right to renew their applications for leave to the Court of Appeal and also remind them that should they do so, and should the Court of Appeal find no merit in their renew applications, the Court of Appeal has the power to order loss of time under section 83W(1) of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance, Cap 221.”

(Lewis Chan)
for Registrar, High Court

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACC 48/2019