Read the full judgment text of CACV 000034/1983 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The respondent Landlord applied to the District Court for an order for possession under s.53(2)(b) of the Landlord & Tenant (Consolidation) Ordinance against his tenant (the 1st Defendant) and 11 sub-tenants. Although the trial judge said that the claim was made on the ground that the Plaintiff required possession for occupation as a residence "for himself, his family and a son over the age of 18 years" this overlooked an amendment or re-amendment which was made to the Particulars of Claim -