China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd and Others v. Zhang Caikui and Others
Read the full judgment text of HCA 2880/2015 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 15 April 2020.
1. At page 24 between line K and L, the words, “On my conclusions on the strike out application, therefore, no discharge of the Mareva Order follows”, should read as “On my conclusions on the strike out application, therefore, no discharge of the Mareva Order follows, but the restrained sum is reduced to HK$24 million. However, in light of the matters raised as referred to in the Postscript herein (see below), the reduction of the restrained sum is stayed until the first hearing of the plaintif
Cited by 3 cases · Cites 1 case
|
HCA 2880/2015 [2019] HKCFI 3033 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO. 2880 OF 2015 ________________________
________________________ Before: Hon Coleman J in Chambers (Open to Public) Date of Hearing: 13 December 2019 Date of Judgment: 11 March 2020 Date of Corrigendum: 15 April 2020 ________________________ CORRIGENDUM ________________________ Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 11 March 2020: - 1. At page 24 between line K and L, the words, “On my conclusions on the strike out application, therefore, no discharge of the Mareva Order follows”, should read as “On my conclusions on the strike out application, therefore, no discharge of the Mareva Order follows, but the restrained sum is reduced to HK$24 million. However, in light of the matters raised as referred to in the Postscript herein (see below), the reduction of the restrained sum is stayed until the first hearing of the plaintiffs' summons dated 23 January 2020 or further order”; and 2. At page 25 between line I and J, the words, “Otherwise, paragraph 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 are dismissed”, should read as “Otherwise, paragraph 1, 2, 4 and 5 are dismissed”; Dated the 15 day of April 2020
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 2880/2015