Vemuri Ezra and Another v. Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 3071/2019 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 20 May 2020.
1. The first applicant is the boyfriend of the second applicant. This is their joint application.
|
HCAL 3071/2019 [2020] HKCFI 863 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 3071 of 2019 BETWEEN
Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review NOTIFICATION of the Judge’s decision (Ord. 53 r. 3) Following;
Order by Deputy High Court Judge K.W. Lung:
Observations for the Applicant: 1.The first applicant is the boyfriend of the second applicant. This is their joint application. 2.The applicants jointly applied for leave to apply for judicial review of the Decision dated 11 October 2019 of the Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office (the “Board’s Decision”). 3.The applicants are Indian national. They came to Hong Kong as visitors on 20 May 2016. They overstayed since 4 June 2016. They surrendered to the Immigration Department on 6 June 2016. They were charged and convicted of the offence of illegally remaining in Hong Kong. They were passed suspended sentences. On 24 November 2016, they jointly lodged non-refoulement claim, which was rejected by the Director of Immigration by his decision dated 27 February 2018. 4.He appealed to the Board. The Board refused their appeal. 5.The applicants filed Form 86 on 17 October 2019 for leave to apply for judicial review of the Board’s Decision. The Court has not yet fixed a hearing date for their application. 6.By affirmation filed on 12 March 2020, the applicants jointly applied to withdraw their application for the reason that they wanted to go back to their own country as their problems in their country had been solved. 7.In the circumstances, it is clear that the applicants have no intention of proceeding with their application, which should be dismissed. CONCLUSION 8.Accordingly, I accede to their request and dismiss their joint application. Dated the 20th day of May 2020
Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence
Form CALL-1 |