Read the full judgment text of FCMC 10908/2012 on BabelCite. This Family Court judgment was delivered on 29 April 2020 before District Judge S LO.
Matrimonial causes – Ancillary relief – Consent Order – Payment of lump sum – Extension of time – Vacation of caveat – Full disclosure of assets – Breach of undertaking – Petitioner sought extension of time to pay lump sum and vacation of caveat registered by Respondent – Court held Petitioner failed to make full disclosure of assets and excuses for delay were unacceptable – Consent Order terms regarding caveat vacation were binding – Court dismissed extension and caveat vacation applications but allowed vacation of Consent Order registration – Respondent granted order for payment of lump sum forthwith
Legal issues: Extension of time to pay lump sum · Vacation of Form A registration · Order for payment of lump sum · Vacation of Consent Order registration
Outcome: W's application for extension of time dismissed. W's application to vacate Form A registration dismissed. H's application for payment of $19.5m granted. W's application to vacate Consent Order registration allowed.
Cites 2 cases