Paloma Co Ltd v. Capxon Electronic Industrial Co Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCCT 53/2017 on BabelCite. This 高等法院原訟法庭 judgment was delivered on 14 May 2020 before Hon K Yeung J.

Arbitration – Enforcement of arbitral award dated 6 August 2014 – Application under section 87 of Arbitration Ordinance (Cap 609) and Order 73, rule 10 of Rules of the High Court (Cap 4A) – Parties: PALOMA COMPANY LIMITED (Applicant/Judgment Creditor) v CAPXON ELECTRONIC INDUSTRIAL COMPANY LIMITED (Respondent/Judgment Debtor) – Judgment given in the Court of First Instance (Construction and Arbitration Proceedings) – Corrigendum issued correcting typographical error on page 6 clarifying phrase as 'no invasion of any legal or equitable right of the judgment creditor' – No further details on legal issues, factual background or outcome provided in published judgment excerpt.

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCCT 53/2017[2020] HKCFI 755
Court
高等法院原訟法庭
Date14 May 2020
JudgeHon K Yeung J
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCT 53/2017

[2020] HKCFI 755

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTRUCTION AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS

NO 53 OF 2017

____________

  IN THE MATTER of section 87 of the Arbitration Ordinance, Cap 609 and Order 73, rule 10 of the Rules of the High Court, Cap 4A
 

and

  IN THE MATTER of an Arbitral Award dated 6 August 2014 by Takeo Kosugi, Kazuo Iwasaki and Takafumi Ochiai

____________

BETWEEN    
  PALOMA COMPANY LIMITED Applicant /
Claimant in
the Arbitration
(Judgment Creditor)
  and  
  CAPXON ELECTRONIC INDUSTRIAL COMPANY LIMITED Respondent /
Respondent in
the Arbitration
(Judgment Debtor)

____________

Before:  Hon K Yeung J in Chambers
Dates of Hearing:  26 September 2019
Date of Decision:  14 May 2020
Date of Corrigendum:  8 June 2020

________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

________________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Decision dated 14 May 2020:-

1.  Line O of page 6, “… no invasion of any legal or equitable of the judgment creditor …” should read “… no invasion of any legal or equitable right of the judgment creditor …”.

  (Vivian Fu)
  Clerk to the Honourable Mr Justice K Yeung