Afzaal Ahmed v. Torture Claims Appeal Board
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 2364/2018 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 22 June 2020.
1. The Applicant is a national of Pakistan who entered Hong Kong illegally in January 2015 and was arrested by police in March 2015 for that offence and for undertaking unauthorized employment for which he was subsequently convicted and sentenced to prison for 15 months. After his discharge from prison and was referred to the Immigration Department for deportation, he raised a non-refoulement claim on the basis that if he returned to Pakistan he would be harmed or killed by the local drug deale
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
HCAL 2364/2018 [2020] HKCFI 1275 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 2364 of 2018 BETWEEN
Following:
Order by Deputy High Court Judge Bruno Chan: Leave to apply for judicial review dismissed. Observations for the Applicant: 1.The Applicant is a national of Pakistan who entered Hong Kong illegally in January 2015 and was arrested by police in March 2015 for that offence and for undertaking unauthorized employment for which he was subsequently convicted and sentenced to prison for 15 months. After his discharge from prison and was referred to the Immigration Department for deportation, he raised a non-refoulement claim on the basis that if he returned to Pakistan he would be harmed or killed by the local drug dealer for refusing to participate in their illegal activities. 2.On 5 December 2016 his non-refoulement claim was rejected by the Director of Immigration, while his subsequent appeal to the Torture Claims Appeal Board (“the Board”) was also dismissed on 11 August 2017. 3.On 26 October 2018 the Applicant filed a notice of application for leave to apply for judicial review of the Board’s decision, with which he was seriously late by more than 11 months, but before his application could be dealt with by the court, he wrote a letter to the court requesting to withdraw his application and stated as follows:
4.As such and given that the basis of his non-refoulement claim no longer exists and that it would be safe for him to return to his home country, it would be appropriate that his application be dismissed instead of withdrawn, and accordingly I dismiss his leave application. Dated the 22nd day of June 2020.
Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence
Form CALL-1
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 2364/2018