Gurvinder Singh and Another v. Torture Claims Appeal Board/ Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 1335/2019 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 6 July 2020.
1. The applicants’ Form 86 is amended to have the Torture Claims Appeal Board as proposed respondent and the Director or Immigration as interested party.
Cites 1 case
|
HCAL 1335/2019 [2020] HKCFI 1455 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 1335 of 2019 BETWEEN
Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review NOTIFICATION of the Judge’s decision (Ord. 53 r. 3) Following;
Order by Deputy High Court Judge K.W. Lung:
Observations for the Applicants: 1.The applicants’ Form 86 is amended to have the Torture Claims Appeal Board as proposed respondent and the Director or Immigration as interested party. 2.This is the applicants’ application for leave to apply for judicial review of the Decision dated 27 September 2018 of the Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office (“the Board’s Decision”). 3.The applicants are Indian nationals. They are illegal immigrants. They applied to the Director for non-refoulement claim. The Director rejected their application. 4.The applicants appealed to the Board against the Director’s Decision. 5.By the Board’s Decision, the Board rejected their appeal and confirmed the Director’s Decision. 6.The applicants filed Form 86 on 17 May 2019 for leave to apply for judicial review of the Board’s Decision. 7.However, the 1st applicant sent a letter dated 6 May 2020 to the Court seeking to withdraw their application because they wanted to go back to attend his sick mother. 8.It is clear that the applicants have no intention of proceeding with their application. As such, their application should be dismissed. 9.Accordingly, I accede to the 1st applicant’s request and dismiss their application. Dated the 6th day of July 2020
Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence
Form CALL-1 |
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 1335/2019