Read the full judgment text of HCAL 2836/2018 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 30 July 2020.
1. The applicant had made a non-refoulement claim to the Director of Immigration (“ the Director ”). His application was assessed by reference to the Torture risk under Part VIIC of the Immigration Ordinance, Cap 115, Article 3 of section 8 of the Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance, Cap 383 (“ BOR3 risk ”) and risk of persecution by reference to the non-refoulement principle under Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (“ Persecution risk ”).
Cites 3 cases