Re Wah Fook Hong International Co Ltd (“The Company”)

Read the full judgment text of HCCW 6/2018 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 4 September 2020.

1. I have before me an application to stay the winding-up of the Company which was put into liquidation in March 2018. The application is straight forward.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCCW 6/2018[2020] HKCFI 2362
Court
High Court CFI
Date04 Sep 2020
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCW 6/2018

[2020] HKCFI 2362

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

COMPANIES WINDING-UP PROCEEDINGS NO 6 OF 2018

________________________

  IN THE MATTER OF The Companies (Winding Up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance, Cap 32
  and
  IN THE MATTER OF Wah Fook Hong International Company Limited (“the Company”)

________________________

Before: Hon Harris J in Court
Date of Hearing: 4 September 2020
Date of Decision: 4 September 2020

________________________

D E C I S I O N

________________________

1.I have before me an application to stay the winding-up of the Company which was put into liquidation in March 2018. The application is straight forward.

2.The Company has two creditors, both of whom have been paid.  It would appear that it has, in the form of a Mainland subsidiary, underlying assets which an investor wishes to acquire and for that purpose it is proposed that the liquidation is terminated.  The liquidators have provided to the Official Receiver and the court a report.  Neither the liquidators nor the Official Receiver suggest that there are any outstanding matters including action in respect of any director’s breach of duty that require action.

3.The principles that guide the court’s consideration of applications for a permanent stay of a winding-up are explained in various decisions.  To succeed in the application, the burden is on the company to make out a sufficient case for a stay that carries conviction.  The court considers:

(a)  the interests of members creditors and the liquidator;

(b)  whether the stay is conducive or detrimental to commercial morality and to the interest of the public at large; and

(c)  whether if a stay is granted all creditors and potential outstanding liabilities of the company are provided for.

See: Re The Grande Holdings Ltd [1].

4.I am satisfied that this is an appropriate case for a permanent stay to be granted and I so order.  I further order the liquidators namely, Huen Ho Yin and Huen Yuen Fun be discharged forthwith.

  (Jonathan Harris)
  Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Mr Avery Chan, instructed by Oldham, Li & Nie, for the petitioner

The attendance of Huen & Partners, for the joint and several liquidators, was excused



[1]  (Unreported, HCCW 177/2011, 9 May 2016) at [2].