HKSAR v. Cheung Yat Sing
Read the full judgment text of HCMA 536/2019 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 14 May 2020.
1. Paragraph 6, “The appellant’s mobile phone was examined by the police” should be “examined by the ICAC”;
Cited by 2 cases
|
HCMA536/2019 [2020] HKCFI 752 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Appellate Jurisdiction) MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO HCMA536/2019 (ON APPEAL FROM ESCC1490 OF 2019) --------------------------
--------------------------
-------------------------- CORRIGENDUM -------------------------- Kindly note that the following correction in the Judgment handed down by The Honourable Madam Justice Toh on 14/05/2020： 1.Paragraph 6, “The appellant’s mobile phone was examined by the police” should be “examined by the ICAC”; 2.Page 5, the third line, “six months later” should be “eight months later”. Dated this 16th day of September 2020
|
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCMA 536/2019