Read the full judgment text of HCA 1992/2018 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 30 November 2020.
1. The Plaintiff was the former landlord of shop premises which she had acquired by way of adverse possession. The Defendant was her former tenant. After recovering the premises from the Defendant through the bailiffs, the Plaintiff had been doing business there. However, the Defendant obstructed the entrance, changed the lock and broke in. The Plaintiff sued the Defendant for trespass. Since the Plaintiff had surrendered the premises to the Urban Renewal Authority (“ URA ”), she now seeks s
Cited by 1 case · Cites 5 cases