Read the full judgment text of HCA 1008/2019 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 19 February 2021.
1. The Defendant was not in Hong Kong on the day of service of the writ. The writ was initially served by insertion into the letter box of the Defendant’s last known address and, later, by way of substituted service. A Master set aside the service. This is the Plaintiff’s appeal against the Master’s decision
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 6 cases