Gurung Anita v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 2507/2019 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 18 March 2021.
1. The applicant filed Form 86 dated 29 August 2019 for application for leave to apply for judicial review of the Decision dated 25 July 2019 of the Torture Claims Appeal Board (“ the Board ”)
|
HCAL 2507/2019 [2021] HKCFI 666 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 2507 of 2019 BETWEEN
Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review NOTIFICATION of the Judge’s decision (Ord. 53 r. 3) Following;
Order by Deputy High Court Judge K.W. Lung:
Observations for the Applicant: 1.The applicant filed Form 86 dated 29 August 2019 for application for leave to apply for judicial review of the Decision dated 25 July 2019 of the Torture Claims Appeal Board (“the Board”) 2.The applicant’s Form 86 is amended to have the Board as proposed respondent and the Director or Immigration as the interested party. 3.By Affirmation dated 26 February 2021, the applicant applied to this Court to cancel her judicial review application. In her affirmation, she said that she wanted to go back to Nepal. 4.It is clear that the applicant has no intention of proceeding with her application. As such, her application should be dismissed. 5.Accordingly, I accede to the applicant’s request and dismiss her application. Dated the 18th day of March 2021
Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence
Form CALL-1 |