Wong Chiu Wing v. Wong Siu Wah

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1582/2019 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 11 May 2021.

1. I refer to my Decision of 14 October 2020. The matter has since been settled. I am now requested to deal with the part of the costs that was reserved on the last occasion.

Cited by 2 cases

Case No.HCMP 1582/2019[2021] HKCFI 1330
Court
High Court CFI
Date11 May 2021
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 1582/2019

[2021] HKCFI 1330

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 1582 OF 2019

____________

  IN THE MATTER of the estate of MOK YUEN KWAN(莫婉君), late of 1st Floor, Block C, Jade Forest Villa, No 74 Tung Tsz, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong, deceased
 

and

  IN THE MATTER of Order 85 of the Rules of the High Court (Cap 4A)
 

and

  IN THE MATTER of Section 33(3) of the Probate and Administration Ordinance (Cap 10)

_____________

BETWEEN    
  WONG CHIU WING(黃昭穎) Plaintiff

and

  WONG SIU WAH(黃兆華) Defendant

_____________

Before: Hon K Yeung J in Chambers

Date of Submissions on Costs by the Plaintiff: 21 April 2021

Date of Submissions on Costs by the Defendant: 21 April 2021

Date of Reply Submissions by the Plaintiff: 28 April 2021

Date of Decision on Costs: 11 May 2021

_______________________

DECISION ON COSTS

_______________________

1.I refer to my Decision of 14 October 2020. The matter has since been settled. I am now requested to deal with the part of the costs that was reserved on the last occasion.

2.I have considered parties’ submissions.  I agree that, despite the settlement, P is the effective winner.  I also agree that P’s claim for costs against D was made under the 3rd class of cases referred to in Re Buckton [1907] 2 Ch 406[1], a class where the application to the court is made by a beneficiary but is, in substance although not in form, an adverse claim made in hostile litigation.  I accept Mr Ho’s submissions that the costs should not be paid out of the estate.  I order that the costs concerned should be paid by D.

3.On quantum, I find the total sum of HK$276,450 excessive.  I find Items C1 and C2 (attendance on client and the other side) of 20 hours in total in particular excessive.  I also find Item D1 (12 hours of preparation of documents) in particular excessive.  Adopting a broad brush approach, I assess the total costs at HK$130,000.  This is on top of the sum of HK$70,000 summarily assessed on the last occasion.

(Keith Yeung)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Submissions on Costs and Reply Submissions by Mr Martin Ho, instructed by Charles Yeung Clement Lam Liu & Yip, for the Plaintiff

Submissions on Costs by Matthew Ng & Co, for the Defendant

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCMP 1582/2019