Success Active Ltd v. Harbourview International Holdings Ltd and Others

Read the full judgment text of LDCS 31000/2018 on BabelCite. This LDCS judgment was delivered on 19 April 2021.

1.  Please note the following corrigenda in the Judgment dated 19 April 2021: -

Cites 1 case

Case No.LDCS 31000/2018
Court
LDCS
Date19 Apr 2021
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

LDCS 31000/2018

[2021] HKLdT 24

IN THE LANDS TRIBUNAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

LAND COMPULSORY SALE MAIN APPLICATION NO 31000 OF 2018

__________________________

BETWEEN    
  SUCCESS ACTIVE LIMITED Applicant
  and
  HARBOURVIEW INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED
(恒港國際集團有限公司)
1st Respondent
  CHU CHUN MING 2nd Respondent
  LAU HUNG 3rd Respondent
(discontinued)
  FOK SIU BING 4th Respondent
  YAU YEE HOLDINGS LIMITED
(友誼集團有限公司)
5th Respondent

__________________________

Before: Deputy District Judge Soong, Presiding Officer of the Lands Tribunal and Mr Lawrence Pang, Member of the Lands Tribunal

Dates of Hearing:  1-4, 9-11, 14-16 & 18 December 2020

Date of Closing Submissions: 8 February 2021

Date of Judgment:  19 April 2021

Date of Corrigenda:  17 May 2021

____________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

____________________

1.  Please note the following corrigenda in the Judgment dated 19 April 2021: -

2.  At paragraph 214, “We arrive at a land value of the Lots at $273,133,000 (ie accommodation value of $86,486/m2).” should read “We arrive at a land value of the Lots at $294,277,000 (ie accommodation value of $93,181/m2).”

3.  At paragraph 250, “the reserve price of the Lots to $300,000,000 (which is some 9.8% higher than the value of $273,133,000 assessed by the residual valuation method).” should read “the reserve price of the Lots to $300,000,000 (which is some 1.9% higher than the value of $294,277,000 assessed by the residual valuation method).”

4.  The Appendix 1 at page 104 should replace as follow:

Appendix 1
G/F Retail 236.4 m2 x $261,375 /m = $61,789,050
1/F Retail 249.4 m2 x $170,000 /m = $42,398,000
Residential Flats 1,908.01 m2 x $250,040 /m = $477,078,820
3/F Flat Roof 3.76 m2 x $36,425 /m = $136,958
Top Roof 90.24 m2 x $36,425 /m = $3,286,992
---------------
$584,689,820
Marketing cost 3% x 0.97
Present Value for 2.5 years @ 4% x 0.9066
---------------  
$514,177,397
Less
Demolition Cost 2,000.00 m2 x $2,200 /m = $4,400,000
Professional Fee @ 6% x 1.06
Profit @ 15% x 1.15
---------------
$5,363,600
Present Value for 0.25 years @ 4% x 0.99024
---------------  
$5,311,251
Construction Cost $137,160,131
Professional Fee @ 6% x 1.06
Profit @ 15% x 1.15
---------------
$167,198,200
Present Value for 1.5 years @ 4% x 0.94287
---------------  
$157,646,167
---------------
$351,219,979
Stamp Duty @ 4.25%
Legal Cost @ 0.10%
Developer's Profit on Land 15% ÷ 1.1935
---------------
$294,277,318
Say $294,277,000
Accommodation Value : $93,181/ m2

Dated this 17nd day of May 20201

  (Ms F Y YEUNG)
    Clerk to Member Lawrence Pang  

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under LDCS 31000/2018