HKSAR v. Raman Kapusamy

Read the full judgment text of HCCC 126/2019 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 12 March 2020.

Cited by 1 case

Case No.HCCC 126/2019[2020] HKCFI 635
Court
High Court CFI
Date12 Mar 2020
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCC 126/2019

[2020] HKCFI 635

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CRIMINAL CASE NO 126 OF 2019

________________________

  HKSAR  
  v  
  Raman Kapusamy  

________________________

Before: Hon D’Almada Remedios J
Date: 12 March 2020 at 3.16 pm
Present: Ms Olivia Tsang, on fiat, for HKSAR
Mr Andrew Humphrey Bullett, instructed by Massie & Clement, assigned by DLA, for the accused
Offence: Trafficking in a dangerous drug (販運危險藥物)

________________________

Transcript of the Audio Recording
of the Sentence in the above Case

________________________

COURT: Defendant, after trial, the jury has found you guilty of an offence of trafficking in dangerous drugs, contrary to section 4(1)(a) and (3) of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance.

They have found that on 3 June 2018, you brought into Hong Kong from Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam 2,970 grammes of a crystalline solid containing 2,956 grammes of methamphetamine hydrochloride. The result of their verdict indicated clearly that you were a knowing courier of these drugs. These drugs were concealed in the back panel of three backpacks, each backpack containing approximately 900-odd grammes of what is commonly known as ‘Ice’.

Mr Bullett in his mitigation has said the antecedents are correct and your background, particulars you gave in court were correct. And really, as in many cases of trafficking in dangerous drugs, it appears to be that you were in difficult financial situation. You therefore took up this jaunt for a sum of money. You were caught and, as Mr Bullett has said and told me, your life is now ruined. It is unfortunate but very clear from the many cases that come to court that the traffickers use people like yourself as you are desperate for money and are rewarded a sum to which you take the risk. In this case, you were to be rewarded a sum of some MYR5,000 which was approximately four times your monthly salary. And you were recruited, it would appear, by a man by the name of Chandru.

You are a 35-year-old Malaysian. You speak Tamil and Bahasa. You were educated up to Grade 9, was married and have three children. Your evidence in court was that your wife left you and your cousin is looking after your three young children.

I have no doubt you are aware that trafficking in dangerous drugs is a very, very serious offence. There are guidelines laid down by the Court of Appeal for trafficking in large amounts of the drug ‘Ice’. The tariff for trafficking in large amount of ‘Ice’ is set down in the case of Abdallah. The bracket to which you fall into is between 1,200 grammes to 4,000 grammes, the starting point is one between 23 and 26 years’ imprisonment.

For this offence which you have committed, there is an established sentencing principle that the offence of drug trafficking is aggravated when a person brings drugs into Hong Kong. A person coming from across the seas importing drugs into Hong Kong for a reward knows full well the effects of the dissemination of the drugs on the streets of Hong Kong. Persons who bring drugs into Hong Kong therefore have their sentence enhanced.

Defendant, please stand up. You have been convicted after trial by the jury. You were trafficking in an amount of 2,956 grammes of ‘Ice’, and for that amount of ‘Ice’ you shall be sentenced to 24 years’ imprisonment. As there was an international element, that sentence is enhanced following Abdallah and that sentence shall be enhanced by 2 years, and you shall therefore be sentenced to a total of 26 years’ imprisonment.

Cited by 1 case

Other judgments that cite this case