Tsang Wing Kwai and Another v. Wong Wing Sze Tiffany, Administratrix To the Estate of Chan Chung Han (陳仲嫺) also known as Chan Chung Hong (陳仲嫺), Deceased and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1615/2020 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 23 June 2021.

1. Before me is a straightforward application made by the applicants to rectify and remove information from the Companies Register pursuant to section 42 of the Companies Ordinance, Cap 622.

Cited by 1 case

Case No.HCMP 1615/2020[2021] HKCFI 1971[2021] 2 HKC 399
Court
High Court CFI
Date23 Jun 2021
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 1615/2020

[2021] HKCFI 1971

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 1615 OF 2020

_________________

BETWEEN    
  TSANG WING KWAI 1st Applicant
  OPEN TREASURE INDUSTRIES LIMITED 2nd Applicant

and

  WONG WING SZE TIFFANY,
Administratrix to the Estate of
CHAN CHUNG HAN ( 陳仲嫺)
also known as CHAN CHUNG HONG
(陳仲嫺), DECEASED
1st Respondent
  TSANG WING FAI 2nd Respondent
  THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES 3rd Respondent

_________________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge Winnie Tsui in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 23 June 2021

Date of Decision: 23 June 2021

_______________

DECISION

_______________

1.Before me is a straightforward application made by the applicants to rectify and remove information from the Companies Register pursuant to section 42 of the Companies Ordinance, Cap 622.

2.The proposed rectification and removal is to give effect to the judgment made by Au-Yeung J on 31 December 2019.  The judgment is binding on the applicants and the 1st and 2nd respondents, who were parties in that action.  It was ordered that the Return of Allotment dated 16 January 2012 be set aside and the Annual Return dated 8 August 2012 be rectified.

3.The 1st and 3rd respondents take a neutral stance in this application.

4.The 2nd respondent has filed an affirmation in opposition.  But no valid ground has been raised why the above orders should not be given effect to.

5.Hence I am satisfied that an order under section 42 should be made.

6.I make an order in terms of the originating summons as amended:

(1)  The Return of Allotment dated 16 January 2012 be removed from the Companies Register;

(2)  The Annual Return dated 8 August 2012 be rectified by striking out the figure of HK$10,000 (being the total amount of issued and paid up capital) and 5,000 (being the number of shares of each registered shareholder) and substituting by the figure of HK$2 (being the total amount of issued and paid up capital) and 1 (being the number of share of each registered shareholder) respectively;

(3)  Costs of this application be paid by the 2nd respondent to the applicants, summarily assessed at $50,000, payable by the 2nd respondent on or before 7 July 2021; and

(4)  There be no order as to costs as between applicants and the 1st and 3rd respondents.

( Winnie Tsui )
Deputy High Court Judge

Mr Alvin Chan, of WK To & Co, for the 1st and 2nd applicants

Attendance of Hugill & Ip, for the 1st respondent, was excused

The 2nd respondent appeared in person

Attendance of the 3rd respondent was excused

Cited by 1 case

Other judgments that cite this case