Reliance Credit Ltd (Formerly Known As Asset Bridge Development Ltd) v. Carnival Group Internationl Holdings Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCCW 66/2021 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 19 July 2021.

1. The present petition was issued on 10 February 2021 seeking the winding up of the Company on the grounds of insolvency. At the time it was issued, there was already an existing petition against the Company. For the reasons explained in my decision in Re Grand Peace Group Holdings Limited [1] , the present petition should not have been issued.

Case No.HCCW 66/2021[2021] HKCFI 2133
Court
High Court CFI
Date19 Jul 2021
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCW 66/2021

[2021] HKCFI 2133

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

COMPANIES WINDING-UP PROCEEDINGS NO 66 OF 2021

________________

  IN THE MATTER OF Carnival Group International Holdings Limited
 

and

  IN THE MATTER OF section 177(1)(d) and 178(1)(a) of the Companies (Winding Up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance (Cap 32)

________________

BETWEEN    
  RELIANCE CREDIT LIMITED
(formerly known as ASSET BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED)
Petitioner

and

  CARNIVAL GROUP INTERNATIONL HOLDINGS LIMITED Respondent

________________

Before: Hon Harris J in Court

Date of Hearing: 19 July 2021

Date of Decision: 19 July 2021

__________________

D E C I S I O N

__________________

1.The present petition was issued on 10 February 2021 seeking the winding up of the Company on the grounds of insolvency. At the time it was issued, there was already an existing petition against the Company. For the reasons explained in my decision in Re Grand Peace Group Holdings Limited[1], the present petition should not have been issued.

2.I understand that the Petitioner was informed of the earlier petition and that it needed to address the procedural irregularity as early as February.  It has failed to do so.  In the circumstances the appropriate course is to dismiss the petition and order that the Petitioner pays the Company’s costs along with those of the Officer Receiver.

3.I would note in passing, although this is not a matter that I have to address that the petition is in any event demurrable.  The Company is incorporated in Bermuda and no facts or matters appear in the petition demonstrating how the three core requirements are satisfied.

(Jonathan Harris)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Mr Damian Wong, instructed by Hobson & Ma, for the petitioner

Mr Look Chan Ho, instructed by WT Law Offices, for the respondent

Attendance of ONC Lawyers, for the supporting creditors (Zhang Jingchu), was excused

Attendance of Clyde & Co., for the supporting creditors (Credit Suisse AG), was excused

Attendance of Chiu, Szeto & Cheng, for the supporting creditors (Zhang Yan), was excused

Mr Raymond Kong, instructed by Official Receiver’s Office, for the Official Receiver


[1]  2021 HKCFI 607.