Masih Sunil Alias Sunil Arif v. Torture Claims Appeal Board
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 1064/2018 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 29 July 2021.
1. On 7 May 2021 I extended time to the applicant’s late application and granted him leave to apply for judicial review of the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board (“Board”) in refusing to allow him to file his notice of appeal without a copy of the decision of the Director of Immigration (“Director”) against which he intended to appeal to the Board, and accordingly directed him to file his originating summons accordingly within 14 days and to serve a copy thereof on the Board as the resp
Cited by 1 case
|
HCAL 1064/2018 [2021] HKCFI 2193 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 1064 OF 2018 _____________
_____________ Before: Deputy High Court Judge Bruno Chan in Chambers Date of Decision: 29 July 2021 _____________ D E C I S I O N _____________ 1.On 7 May 2021 I extended time to the applicant’s late application and granted him leave to apply for judicial review of the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board (“Board”) in refusing to allow him to file his notice of appeal without a copy of the decision of the Director of Immigration (“Director”) against which he intended to appeal to the Board, and accordingly directed him to file his originating summons accordingly within 14 days and to serve a copy thereof on the Board as the respondent and the Director as interested party. 2.The applicant however did not do so, and on 18 June 2021 he wrote to the court to request to withdraw his judicial review application as follows:
3.In the premises, and given his confirmation that whatever problem that had caused him to raise his non-refouelemnt claim in the first place has now been resolved and that his life will no longer be in danger in his home country Pakistan, and hence the basis for his claim no longer exists, I accede to his request and accordingly dismiss his judicial review application.
The applicant was unrepresented | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 1064/2018