Tong Ying Kit v. Secretary for Justice
Read the full judgment text of CACV 293/2021 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 22 June 2021.
1. In paragraph 27 at page 13I-J, “… directed by NSL 46(1) case is per se unconstitutional” should read “… directed by NSL 46(1) is per se unconstitutional”.
Cited by 3 cases · Cites 1 case
|
CACV 293/2021 [2021] HKCA 912 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 293 OF 2021 (ON APPEAL FROM HCAL NO. 473 OF 2021) ________________________
________________________ Before: Hon Poon CJHC, Yeung VP and Lam VP in Court Date of Hearing: 15 June 2021 Date of Judgment: 22 June 2021 Date of Corrigendum: 30 July 2021 ____________________ CORRIGENDUM ____________________ 1. In paragraph 27 at page 13I-J, “… directed by NSL 46(1) case is per se unconstitutional” should read “… directed by NSL 46(1) is per se unconstitutional”. 2. In paragraph 60 at page 28K-L, “… the applicants’ argument that the right to fair trial…” should read “… the applicants’ argument based on the right to fair trial…”.
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 293/2021