Re Violet Profit Holdings Ltd (in Liquidation)
Read the full judgment text of HCCW 366/2018 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 29 July 2021.
1. On 27 February 2019 an order was made by the court winding up the Company. On 2 July 2021 the Company’s sole shareholder issued a summons seeking a permanent stay of the winding up proceedings.
Cites 1 case
|
HCCW 366/2018 [2021] HKCFI 2249 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE COMPANIES WINDING-UP PROCEEDINGS NO 366 OF 2018 ________________________
________________________
________________________ D E C I S I O N ________________________ 1.On 27 February 2019 an order was made by the court winding up the Company. On 2 July 2021 the Company’s sole shareholder issued a summons seeking a permanent stay of the winding up proceedings. 2.The Liquidators have filed evidence in response to the application and have been represented by counsel today. The position as at the time of the hearing is that it would appear there is no reason to think there is any unpaid creditor of the Company which the evidence demonstrates is balance sheet solvent. Although the Liquidators have in the past been investigating the custody of certain shares which they were concerned the Company had an interest in and needed to recover, there is currently no relevant outstanding matter which requires investigation and would justify declining the application for a stay. 3.The principles governing the grant of a permanent stay of a winding up are uncontroversial. They are as follows:
See Re The Grande Holdings Ltd [1]; Leung Kai Hung v Choi Tze Kit Sammy [2]. 4.I am satisfied that they are met in the present case and I will grant an order that all further proceedings in relation to the winding up of the Company be permanently stay and that there be no order as to costs.
Mr Look Chan Ho, instructed by Jones Day, for the applicant Ms Frances Lok, instructed by Wilkinson & Grist, for the liquidators The attendance of the Official Receiver was excused |