Osman Mohammed Arab and Another v. Ng Shui Ching, Irene and Another
Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 10 August 2021.
1. Further to our Determination [2021] HKCFA 23 , refusing the applicants leave to appeal, and having received written submissions from the parties, we order that the costs of the application for leave to appeal be paid by the applicants to the respondents on the usual party and party basis, certified fit for two counsel.
Cites 1 case
|
FAMV No. 95 of 2021 [2021] HKCFA 29 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 95 OF 2021 (CIVIL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACV NO. 5 OF 2018) ________________________
________________________ Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Fok PJ and Mr Justice Bokhary NPJ Date of Ruling on Costs: 10 August 2021 ____________________ RULING ON COSTS ____________________ Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ: 1.Further to our Determination [2021] HKCFA 23, refusing the applicants leave to appeal, and having received written submissions from the parties, we order that the costs of the application for leave to appeal be paid by the applicants to the respondents on the usual party and party basis, certified fit for two counsel.
Munros, for the Plaintiff (Applicant) Huen & Partners, for the 1st and 2nd Defendants (1st and 2nd Respondents) |
Cases cited in this judgment