HKSAR v. Li Chun Yao

Read the full judgment text of CACC 167/2002 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 19 July 2002.

1. The applicant has not demonstrated that the sentence imposed was either manifestly excessive or wrong in principle. Accordingly the application for leave to appeal against sentence is dismissed.

Case No.CACC 167/2002
Court
Court of Appeal
Date19 Jul 2002
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC000167/2002

CACC 167/2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 167 OF 2002

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC 1196 OF 2001)

______________

BETWEEN
HKSAR Respondent
AND
LI CHUN-YAO Applicant

______________

Coram: Hon Mayo VP in Court

Date of Hearing: 19 July 2002

Date of Judgment: 19 July 2002

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

1. The applicant has not demonstrated that the sentence imposed was either manifestly excessive or wrong in principle. Accordingly the application for leave to appeal against sentence is dismissed.

(Simon Mayo)
Vice-President

Representation:

Mr Simon Tso, SGC, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent.

Applicant in person.