Gorgeous Investment Group Holding Co, Ltd v. Industrial Bank Co, Ltd and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCA 356/2021 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 1 June 2021.

1.  6 th line of paragraph 75, “there was evidence to support” should read “there was no evidence to support”.

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 356/2021[2021] HKCFI 1966
Court
High Court CFI
Date01 Jun 2021
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 356/2021

[2021] HKCFI 1966

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 356 OF 2021

____________________

BETWEEN    
  GORGEOUS INVESTMENT GROUP HOLDING CO, LIMITED
(國之傑投資控股有限公司)
Plaintiff
  and  
  INDUSTRIAL BANK CO, LTD
(興業銀行股份有限公司)
1st Defendant
  CHINA INDUSTRIAL SECURITIES INTERNATIONAL BROKERAGE LIMITED
(興證國際證券有限公司)
2nd Defendant
  LAI KAR YAN DEREK 3rd Defendant
  HO KWOK LEUNG GLEN 4th Defendant

____________________

Before: Hon B Chu J in Chambers (Open to Public)

Date of Hearing: 1 June 2021

Date of Decision:  1 June 2021

Date of Reasons for Decision:  16 July 2021

Date of Corrigendum: 23 August 2021

-----------------

Corrigendum

-----------------

Please note the following corrigendum in the Reasons for Decision dated 16 July 2021:-

1.  6th line of paragraph 75, “there was evidence to support” should read “there was no evidence to support”.

Dated this 23rd day of August 2021

   (Sarah Hui)
   Clerk to the Hon Madam Justice B Chu

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCA 356/2021